Advanced Pavement Materials for Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure
View this Special IssueResearch Article  Open Access
Tao Ma, Kai Cui, Yongli Zhao, Xiaoming Huang, "Fatigue Evaluation of Recycled Asphalt Mixture Based on EnergyControlled Mode", Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2017, Article ID 3623658, 7 pages, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3623658
Fatigue Evaluation of Recycled Asphalt Mixture Based on EnergyControlled Mode
Abstract
The fatigue properties of asphalt mixtures are important inputs for mechanisticempirical pavement design. To understand the fatigue properties of asphalt mixtures better and to predict the fatigue life of asphalt mixtures more precisely, the energycontrolled test mode was introduced. Based on the implementation theory, the laboratory practice for the energycontrolled mode was realized using a fourpointbending fatigue test with multiplestep loading. In this mode, the fatigue performance of typical AC20 asphalt specimens with various reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) contents was tested and evaluated. Results show that the variation regulation of the dissipated energy and accumulative energy is compatible with the loading control principle, which proves the feasibility of the method. In addition, the fatigue life of the asphalt mixture in the energycontrolled mode was between that for the stresscontrolled and straincontrolled modes. The specimen with a higher RAP content has a longer fatigue life and better fatigue performance.
1. Introduction
With the service life of asphalt pavement increasing, maintenance and rehabilitation are inevitable. In addition, more and more reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) materials have been created. Meanwhile, with the construction cost and energy consumption increasing, the recycling of RAP in new asphalt pavement has attracted more and more attention, especially in China [1, 2]. Many studies have proved that the successful conduction of hot recycling technology of RAP can generate recycled asphalt pavement with the same performance as that of new asphalt pavement [3, 4]. However, studies also indicate that the addition of RAP can affect the fatigue durability of recycled asphalt pavement [5, 6]. Thus, many researchers are still focusing on how to evaluate and improve performance, especially the fatigue durability of the recycled asphalt mixture.
The fatigue properties of asphalt pavement determine its design life. Asphalt pavement structural defects, especially fatigue cracks, are caused by the failure of the asphalt mixture’s antifatigue properties. Therefore, fatigue properties are the key issue that researchers have focused on [7]. Traditionally, the stress or straincontrolled loading mode is used for laboratory tests. One of the two modes is selected, according to the pavement thickness. Generally, 12.7 cm is regarded as the boundary thickness. If the surface layer of the asphalt pavement is thicker than 12.7 cm, the stresscontrolled mode would be selected; otherwise, the straincontrolled mode would be selected [8]. However, with the fabrication of new pavement materials, alteration of pavement design theory, and the appearance of new failure modes, the rationale behind this classification standard has been widely questioned [9].
Fatigue tests for different gradations and different mixture components were conducted, based on the stresscontrolled and the straincontrolled mode, respectively [10–12]. Results indicated that, in the straincontrolled mode, fatigue life increases as the initial modulus decreases. However, in the stresscontrolled mode, the fatigue life increases as the initial modulus increases. Thus, it can be seen that the control mode plays a critical role in the evaluation of asphalt mixture fatigue properties. In view of this, many researchers only use one control mode to evaluate asphalt mixture properties and construct fatigue damage models considering modulus, dissipated energy, and accumulative energy [13–16]. Some studies concentrated on the differences and relations between the two control modes, trying to unify the evaluation indexes [17–20] or to convert one to another [21]. However, these studies are still confined to either the stresscontrolled mode or the straincontrolled mode.
Previous research [22–26] has shown that the fatigue process of the bottom surface layer of the asphalt pavement is more related to the energy than to the stress in the stresscontrolled and the strain in the straincontrolled modes. The dissipated energy of each loading cycle remains approximately constant [27, 28]. Thus, the energycontrolled loading mode was proposed in this study, and the method to achieve it utilized a fourpoint bending (4PB) fatigue test device. Thereafter, fatigue properties of the asphalt mixture with 0%, 25%, and 50% RAP contents were evaluated. The test results could contribute to the establishment of a new estimation index for fatigue properties of asphalt mixtures.
2. Theory
During one fatigue loading cycle in a 4PB test, the dissipated energy of a beam could be calculated by the following equation:where is the force applied to the beam [N], is the measured beam deflection [m], is the phase angle between force and displacement [rad], and is the frequency of applied force and displacement [rad/s].
could be determined by the product of the flexural modulus and the deflection of the beam, so (1) could also be expressed aswhere is the modulus of the beam.
In (2), it should be noted that equals the energy applied to the beam in the energycontrolled mode. The phase angle is a property of the material itself, which corresponds to the proportion of dissipated energy. Changes during the test are so small that they could be neglected when calculating the dissipated energy. During the fatigue test, as long as remains constant, the energy applied to the beam could be regarded as a constant. In this way, the energycontrolled mode can be achieved theoretically.
Under the straincontrolled mode, the modulus and bottom tensile strain of the beam can be continuously renewed by software using realtime data from the displacement sensor, which makes it possible to control the applied energy. Because the deflection is directly proportional to the bottom tensile strain of the beam , can be used as the controlled index. The control theory is as follows:where is initial flexural modulus of the beam, is the initial bottom tensile strain of the beam, is the flexural modulus of the beam at Cycle , and is the bottom tensile strain of the beam at Cycle .
Because of the inherent limitation of the 4PB fatigue test device, the energycontrolled mode cannot be achieved directly. In the straincontrolled mode, when the strain was controlled, the modulus at Cycle could be output in real time. Accordingly, the force applied to the beam was adjusted to , to guarantee that the bottom tensile strain of the beam at Cycle would be equal to the initial tensile strain . Referring to (3) and the theory of the straincontrolled mode, we propose a laboratory operational method, based on a 4PB device, called multiplestep loading: according to the modulus at Cycle N, shift the bottom tensile strain of the beam to and then shift the force applied to the beam to Thus, the energy applied to the beam can remain constant as . Using this method, the energycontrolled mode could be achieved. In the experiment, each time the force and the strain are adjusted, the fatigue test machine should be restarted. Thus, the higher the precision requirement is, the longer the break time that will be taken. However, the fatigue damage might mitigate during the intermittence due to the asphalt selfhealing effect [29–31], which would reduce the accuracy. In this study, a 15% reduction of the beam modulus was used for the loading process, and the fracture of the beam was set as the standard of failure.
3. Operation Method for the EnergyControlled Mode
A base asphalt with a penetration grade of 70 was used as a binder. Aggregates used for the mixture design were 100% limestone, and the mineral powder was limestone powder. RAP materials were milled from the surface layer of an expressway that had been used for 10 years and showed serious pavement defects such as cracking, raveling, and rutting. These materials were subsequently then processed in a plant. Next, the RAP materials were obtained from the mix plant and used for laboratory tests. The gradation of RAP materials is shown in Table 1. The basic properties of the extracted RAP binder are shown in Table 2. A dense graded asphalt mixture with a nominal maximum aggregate size of 19 mm (AC20) was used as the design type of the new asphalt mixture and recycled asphalt mixture. The designed gradation of AC20 is shown in Figure 1. By using the designed gradation as the target gradation, three AC20 with RAP contents of 0%, 25%, and 50% were prepared, and their gradations are also shown in Figure 1. All the prepared mixtures were subjected to fatigue tests with different controlled modes, and their fatigue properties were analyzed.


The operational procedures for the energycontrolled mode were as follows.
Step 1 (specimen preservation). Put the specimen into the environmental chamber for preservation for no less than 4 h at the test temperature ± 0.5°C.
Step 2 (specimen placement). Install the specimen on the 4PB test device and fix it with clamps. Place the LVDT and make sure it is in contact with specimen surface. Then, adjust its position to the middle of the beam. The initial readout of the LVDT should be as close to zero as possible.
Step 3 (parameter decision). The beam should be tested under a sine wave load, initial strain, and a loading frequency of 10 Hz.
Step 4 (initial strain decision). Specimens with different RAP contents have different moduli. Therefore, to ensure that the energy applied to each specimen is equal, the initial strain value should be different. The beam is first loaded under for 500 cycles, and the stiffness modulus in the 500th cycle is the initial modulus . The initial strain for each beam can then be calculated.
Step 5. Create a new test file on the computer, set the target strain as , and then begin loading. When the modulus of the beam decreases to 0.85, stop the test.
Step 6. Repeat Step 5 with the strain target as 1.0847. Because of the asphalt selfhealing effect, the modulus may increase during the break. Generally, the modulus will drop again to the level before the break after about 200 cycles. Continue to load, until the modulus drops to 0.7225.
Step 7. Repeat Step 5 with the target strains shown in Table 3. Keep loading until the beam fractures.

Step 8. Add up the cycle number of each loading level. Then, the fatigue life and a diagram of the flexural stiffness modulus varying with cycle number can be obtained.
At the beginning of loading Step 1, since the initial modulus was obtained with an initial strain , the energy applied to the beam at the beginning of the first loading process could be expressed as where is the energy applied to the beam and is a constant.
The force applied to the beam could be expressed aswhere is a constant.
A 15% reduction in beam modulus was used for the loading process. The modulus dropped to at the end of loading Step 1, and the energy applied to the beam dropped to 0.85. The force applied on the beam dropped to 0.85. Then, the device was stopped and prepared for loading Step 2. To achieve the energycontrolled mode, the energy applied to the beam at the beginning of loading Step 2 should be the same as . According to (3), if is equal to , the energy applied to the beam at the beginning of loading Step 2 could be , the same as the first loading process. The force applied to the beam becomes . Repeating the calculation, the values in Table 3 can be obtained step by step.
4. Comparison between Different Control Modes
4.1. Fatigue Test Results under the EnergyControlled Mode
The fatigue test in the energycontrolled mode was conducted using a multiplestep loading method, at a temperature of 15°C. The size and manufacturing method of the beam, test conditions, and devices all followed the standard T07392011 test method from the Chinese specification JTG E202011 [32]. After each loading level, data such as fatigue life, dissipated energy, and modulus can be obtained. Summarizing these data makes it possible to draw the variation curves for the entire fatigue life. The variation regulation of dissipated energy, accumulative dissipated energy, and modulus is illustrated in Figures 2, 3, and 4, respectively.
As shown in Figures 2 and 3, when loading in the energycontrolled mode, there is a highly linear relationship between the accumulative dissipated energy and loading times, although the force applied and the dissipated energy during each loading level decreased. The energy applied to each beam is the same, so the curves of accumulative dissipated energy of different beams roughly coincide with each other. This confirms the accuracy of the test method. From Figure 4, it can be seen that the modulus decreases with an increase in loading times, and, as in the straincontrolled mode and the stresscontrolled mode, the fatigue process of the energycontrolled mode can be divided into three periods: initial, stable, and fracture period. In addition, fatigue properties were evaluated by loading times in the energycontrolled mode. Figures 2, 3, and 4 show that AC20 with 50% RAP content performs best, followed by 25% RAP content, and 0% performs the worst. In addition, the poorer the fatigue properties were, the faster the material modulus reduced. The loading times of the initial period and fracture period vary little between different control modes, and the fatigue life depends greatly on the stable period. In this respect, there was no significant difference among the three control modes.
4.2. Comparison of Fatigue Test Results under Different Control Modes
Fatigue tests under the straincontrolled and stresscontrolled modes were conducted at a temperature of 15°C, for comparison with the energycontrolled mode. In the straincontrolled mode, the target strain was set at 450, and the test stopped when the modulus decreased by 50%. The accumulative dissipated energy variation regulation during the fatigue test is shown in Figure 5. The modulus variation regulation is shown in Figure 6.
Results showed that AC20 with 25% RAP content had the longest fatigue life, 0% RAP content was second, and 50% had the shortest life. Figure 6 indicates that the mixture had a higher modulus when the RAP content was higher. Thus, the dissipated energy is larger if the mixture has a higher RAP content, when tested at the same strain level. Consequently, in Figure 5, the slope of the 50% RAP content is the largest. Compared with the energycontrolled mode, the growth of accumulative dissipated energy slowed down in later stages in the straincontrolled mode, resulting from a greater decrease in force. Hence, the slope of the curves decreases as loading times increase in Figure 5. Figure 6 illustrates the attenuation process of the modulus. The modulus of the 50% RAP content reduced faster, possibly because the energy applied to the beam was higher. Moreover, the fatigue life of 50% RAP content was the shortest. However, it was not found that its fatigue properties were the poorest, because the energy applied to the beam was higher, which may result in the shortening of the initial period and hastening of the damage accumulation. Even when put in a pavement, the material was able to bear a greater vehicle load with less strain, because of the higher modulus of the 50% RAP content. However, this could hardly be seen from a straincontrolled fatigue test.
The force applied to the beam was 0.952 kN in the stresscontrolled mode. Given the limitations of the test machine, neither the modulus nor the deflection could be obtained. Only the fatigue life of the three control modes could be measured. The results are listed in Table 4.

It is obvious that the higher the modulus was, the longer the fatigue life would be in the stresscontrolled mode. On the contrary, a higher modulus would shorten fatigue life in the straincontrolled mode. Under the energycontrolled mode, the modulus did not affect the fatigue life. In this way, the model can better simulate the actual fatigue process of asphalt pavement, making the evaluation of asphalt mixture fatigue properties more objective.
5. Conclusions
(1) The working process of the test machine was analyzed using dissipated energy variation regulation during fatigue testing in the straincontrolled mode. Based on the process, a theory for the energycontrolled loading mode was proposed. A fourpointbending fatigue test device and a multiplestep loading method were used to conduct the operation steps for the energycontrolled mode.
(2) The fatigue life in the energycontrolled mode is between that of the straincontrolled and stresscontrolled modes. The thickness of the asphalt pavement ceased to be the determining factor for selecting control modes. Instead, the energycontrolled mode can be used for any thickness. The dissipated energy of each loading mode should remain constant.
(3) Fatigue properties of different RAP contents were tested under the energycontrolled mode. It was indicated that the AC20 mixture with 50% RAP content had the longest fatigue life and the best fatigue properties. In conclusion, the higher the RAP content was, the better the fatigue properties would be. The laboratory test results matched the theoretical predictions well, while the consistency between theory and field test results should be further investigated.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work is financially supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 51378006 and no. 51378123), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu (BK20161421), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (no. 2242015R30027), and Open Fund of State Engineering Laboratory of Highway Maintenance Technology (Changsha University of Science & Technology, kfj160104).
References
 T. Ma, X. Huang, Y. Zhao, Y. Zhang, and H. Wang, “Influences of preheating temperature of RAP on properties of hotmix recycled asphalt mixture,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 762–769, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Ma, Y. Zhao, X. Huang, and Y. Zhang, “Using RAP material in high modulus asphalt mixture,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 781–787, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 I. L. Alqadi, M. Elseifi, and S. H. Carpenter, “Reclaimed asphalt pavement—a literature review,” Cracking of Asphalt Concrete Pavements, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
 T. W. Kennedy and W. O. Tam, “Optimizing Use of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement With the Superpave System,” Asphalt Paving Technol, vol. 67, pp. 311–328, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Tusar, E. Nielsen, F. Batista, M. L. Antunes, K. Mollenhauer, and S. Vansteenkiste, “Optimization of reclaimed asphalt in asphalt plant mixing, reroad end of life strategies of asphalt pavements,” European Commission DG Research, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
 R. Ghabchi, M. Barman, D. Singh, M. Zaman, and M. A. Mubaraki, “Comparison of laboratory performance of asphalt mixes containing different proportions of RAS and RAP,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 124, pp. 343–351, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Shannon, A. Mokhtari, H. Lee, S. Tang, C. Williams, and S. Schram, “Effects of high reclaimed asphaltpavement content on the binder grade, fatigue performance, fractionation process, and mix design,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 29, no. 2, Article ID 04016218, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Xie and Z. Guo, “Researching on fatigue model of asphalt mixtures,” Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 21–25, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Lu, “Research on the selection of the fatigue test control mode of asphalt mixture,” Shandong Jiaotong Keji, vol. 1, pp. 60–63, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
 H. Wang, Z. X. Dang, L. Li, and Z. P. You, “Analysis on fatigue crack growth laws for crumb rubber modified (CRM) asphalt mixture,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 47, pp. 1342–1349, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Sabouri, T. Bennert, J. S. Daniel, and Y. R. Kim, “A comprehensive evaluation of the fatigue behaviour of plantproduced rap mixtures,” Road Materials and Pavement Design, vol. 16, pp. 29–54, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Tang, R. C. Williams, and A. A. Cascione, “Reconsideration of the fatigue tests for asphalt mixtures and binders containing high percentage RAP,” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 443–449, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Cong, J. Peng, Z. Guo, and Q. Wang, “Evaluation of fatigue cracking in asphalt mixtures based on surface energy,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 29, no. 3, Article ID D4015003, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Fallon, C. McNally, and A. Gibney, “Evaluation of fatigue resistance in asphalt surface layers containing reclaimed asphalt,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 128, pp. 77–87, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Luo, R. Luo, and R. L. Lytton, “Energybased crack initiation criterion for viscoelastoplastic materials with distributed cracks,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, vol. 141, no. 2, Article ID 04014114, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Sabouri and Y. R. Kim, “Development of a failure criterion for asphalt mixtures under different modes of fatigue loading,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2447, pp. 117–125, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Masad, V. T. F. Castelo Branco, D. N. Little, and R. Lytton, “A unified method for the analysis of controlledstrain and controlledstress fatigue testing,” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 233–246, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Bhasin, V. F. Castelo Branco, E. Masad, and D. N. Little, “Quantitative comparison of energy methods to characterize fatigue in asphalt materials,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 83–92, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Pasetto and N. Baldo, “Unified approach to fatigue study of high performance recycled asphalt concretes,” Materials and Structures, vol. 50, article no. 113, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Hou, B. S. Underwood, and Y. R. Kim, “Fatigue performance prediction of north carolina mixtures using the simplified viscoelastic continuum damage model,” Asphalt Paving Technology: Association of Asphalt Paving TechnologistsProceedings of the Technical Sessions, vol. 79, pp. 35–80, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
 H. Zhang, L. Shan, Y. Tan, Y. Feng, and H. He, “Comparison of asphalt fatigue characteristics under different control modes,” Asphalt Pavements, vol. 1, pp. 1281–1289, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
 D. Lei, P. Zhang, J. He, P. Bai, and F. Zhu, “Fatigue life prediction method of concrete based on energy dissipation,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 145, pp. 419–425, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
 H. Omrani, A. Tanakizadeh, A. R. Ghanizadeh, and M. Fakhri, “Investigating different approaches for evaluation of fatigue performance of warm mix asphalt mixtures,” Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions, vol. 50, no. 2, article no. 149, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Modarres and A. Aloogar, “Comparison between the fatigue response of hot and warm mix asphalts based on the dissipated energy approach,” International Journal of Pavement Engineering, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 60–72, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Ji, Z. Suo, S. Yang, Y. Xu, and S. Xu, “Application of the dissipated energy theory to estimate the fatigue characteristics of hot and warm recycled sma mixtures,” International Symposium on Frontiers of Road and Airport Engineering, pp. 1–9, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
 A. M. Bahadori, A. Mansourkhaki, and M. Ameri, “A phenomenological fatigue performance model of asphalt mixtures based on fracture energy density,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 133–139, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Wu, Fatigue Performance Evaluation of Asphalt Mixture, Southeast University, Jiangsu, China, 2015.
 T. Ma, Y. Zhang, D. Zhang, J. Yan, and Q. Ye, “Influences by air voids on fatigue life of asphalt mixture based on discrete element method,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 126, pp. 785–799, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Luo and R. L. Lytton, “Characterization of healing of asphalt mixtures using creep and steploading recovery test,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 2199–2210, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Hou, L. Wang, T. Pauli, and W. Sun, “Investigation of the asphalt selfhealing mechanism using a phasefield model,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 27, no. 3, Article ID 04014118, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Huang, P. Lin, and M. Huang, “Comparison of the fatigue performance of asphalt mixtures considering selfhealing,” International Symposium on Frontiers of Road and Airport Engineering, pp. 109–121, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
 Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China, Standard Test Methods of Bitumen and Bituminous Mixtures for Highway Engineering (JTG E202011), China Communications Press, Beijing, China, 2011.
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Tao Ma et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.